The landscape of investment in the Chinese stock market,particularly the A-shares,has garnered significant attention in recent years.While the potential for A-shares seems robust,the actual influx of medium to long-term capital has remained relatively subdued.This disparity in investment dynamics raises important questions about how to encourage these funds to take a more prominent role in the market,thus stabilizing it and promoting a healthier investment environment.Several pivotal strategies can pave the way for greater participation from such capital sources,particularly focusing on the role of institutional investors and structural reforms in investment practices.

To begin with,it's crucial to understand why a growing presence of medium to long-term capital could diminish volatility in the A-share market.Currently,the proportion of long-term investments in A-shares is notably low,contributing to higher volatility compared to overseas markets.For instance,data from 2015 to 2024 shows that the annualized volatility of indices like the CSI 300,S&P 500,and Nikkei 225 were reported at 22.1%,17.8%,and 20.5%,respectively.The A-share market’s higher volatility can lead to substantial drawdowns,affecting investor sentiment and making long-term capital allocation a daunting task for individual investors.As we witness an increase in medium to long-term funds entering the market,it is expected that volatility might gradually lessen.This evolution would enhance the experience for investors,ultimately attracting a robust influx of fresh capital specifically from individual investors searching for more stable return experiences.

Another critical component is the current decline in yield from government bonds,which directly affects the returns on various institutional investor segments such as commercial insurance,social security funds,and corporate pension schemes.As of late January 2025,the yield on China's 10-year treasury bonds hovered around 1.6%.Given that a large portion of investments from institutions like commercial insurances is allocated to fixed-income securities,this swift drop-in yields translates into diminished returns on their investments.Some institutions faced the phenomenon of negative returns on bond investments vis-à-vis their liability costs,thereby amplifying investment risks.Encouraging an increased allocation of these institutions’ portfolios towards equity assets can streamline a symbiotic relationship between market performance and institutional returns.As these funds realign towards equities,it promises a dual benefit: elevating returns for the institutions while simultaneously fueling upward momentum in stock prices.

Furthermore,addressing the evaluation mechanisms governing these medium and long-term funds is fundamental to fostering a culture of prolonged investment horizons.Many existing performance assessments focus on monthly or even weekly returns rather than long-term growth,compromising the inherent advantages that come with extended investment timelines.A reorientation toward comprehensive assessments—such as implementing a minimum three-year evaluation period for state-owned insurance companies,where the annual net asset return threshold does not exceed 30%,and ensuring long-term metrics dominate assessments—would help align institutional objectives with a greater emphasis on sustained profitability.Establishing clear standards for performance review,especially with a minimum longevity of five years for national social security funds,is essential.By recalibrating the focus on long-term gains,investors will likely shift their strategies towards more sustainable practices.

In a broader context,the strategies laid out to promote long-term fund investment signal a transformative shift that not only encourages such capital influx but also provides explicit guidelines for evaluation,investment proportions,and operational tactics.As these guidelines take root,the resistance against increased stock market allocation from medium to long-term funds is anticipated to diminish.This progression could ultimately culminate in a virtuous cycle where the infusion of long-term investments propels stock market appreciation,paving the way for A-shares to realize their longer-term investment potential.

Moreover,the ripple effects of such institutional shifts cannot be overstated.For example,countries with established pension fund architectures have witnessed the positive implications of strategic asset allocation towards equities.In contrast,China's relatively nascent investment ecosystem can leverage these insights to tailor policies that not only stabilize its markets but also infuse them with vibrancy and vitality.Active engagement from these institutions,coupled with robust regulatory frameworks,can contribute significantly to minimizing risk and enhancing overall market stability.

Another important consideration is the evolving nature of investment behavior among younger demographics.As millennials and Gen Z step into the realm of investing,their preferences lean towards sustainable and ethical investments.Unlike previous generations that may have prioritized returns above all else,today’s younger investors seek alignment with their values,often favoring firms that demonstrate social responsibility and accountability.Introducing frameworks that encompass these preferences will not only attract these demographics into the capital markets but also foster a more holistic investment culture.

In conclusion,enhancing the contribution of medium to long-term capital in the A-share market is essential for achieving a more stable and sustainable investment environment.By extending investment horizons,pivoting towards equity,and redefining evaluative criteria,China can harness the latent potential of its capital markets.The alignment of institutional strategies with long-term growth objectives will foster an investment ecosystem that not only benefits individual investors in the short run but also solidifies the long-term viability and dynamism of the A-share market.The future,thus,holds promising possibilities where structural reforms can enable a thriving landscape of investments,reinforcing an economy poised for growth and increased resilience.